Posted by Chris Nguyen on September 1, 2016
The Republican Party of Orange County Central Committee met on August 15 and August 31 to consider endorsements for local offices and ballot measures. Further endorsements will take place on September 19 (and possibly more after that).
OC Political live-blogged the August 15 meeting and the August 31 meeting, but by popular demand here is the list of endorsements so far:
- City Councils and Mayors
- Aliso Viejo City Council: Mike Munzing
- Anaheim City Council, District 4: Lucille Kring
- Anaheim City Council, District 5: Mark Lopez
- Costa Mesa City Council: Allan Mansoor, Steve Mensinger, Lee Ramos
- Dana Point City Council: Michelle Brough
- Fountain Valley City Council: Steve Nagel
- Fullerton City Council: Larry Bennett, Bruce Whitaker
- Garden Grove Mayor: Steve Jones
- Huntington Beach City Council: Patrick Brenden, Joe Carchio, Lyn Semeta
- Irvine Mayor: Don Wagner
- Irvine City Council: Anthony Kuo, Christina Shea
- La Habra City Council: Tom Beamish, Dawn Holthouser, Tim Shaw
- Laguna Hills City Council: Janine Heft
- Laguna Niguel City Council: Laurie Davies, John Mark Jennings, Jerry Slusiewicz
- Lake Forest City Council: Francisco Barajas, Dwight Robinson
- Los Alamitos City Council: Dean Grose
- Newport Beach City Council, District 5: Lee Lowrey
- Newport Beach City Council, District 7: Will O’Neill
- Orange City Council: Mark Murphy
- Rancho Santa Margarita City Council: Tony Beall, Carol Gamble
- San Clemente City Council: Dan Bane
- Tustin City Council: Allan Bernstein, Austin Lumbard, Charles Puckett
- Westminster City Council: Kimberly Ho
- Yorba Linda City Council: Tara Campbell, Gene Hernandez, Craig Young
- College Districts
- North Orange County Community College District, Trustee Area 7: Ryan Bent
- Rancho Santiago Community College District, Trustee Area 5: Steven Nguyen
- School Districts
- Capistrano Unified School District, Trustee Area 1: Wendy Shrove
- Capistrano Unified School District, Trustee Area 2: Jim Reardon
- Capistrano Unified School District, Trustee Area 3: Laura Ferguson
- Capistrano Unified School District, Trustee Area 5: Jake Vollebregt
- Santa Ana Unified School District: Angie Cano
- Water Districts
- Orange County Water District, Division 6: Cathy Green
- Mesa Water District, Division 2: James R. Fisler
- Moulton Niguel Water District, Division 6: Duane Cave
- Yorba Linda Water District: Ric Collett, Andy Hall
- No on the Yorba Linda Water District Recall of Directors Bob Kiley and Gary Melton
- Ballot Measures
- No on Measure J – Anaheim Elementary School District $318 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure K – Brea-Olinda Unified School District $148 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure M – Capistrano Unified School District $889 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure N – Centralia Elementary School District $49 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure O – Fountain Valley School District $63 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure P – Garden Grove Unified School District $311 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure Q – Huntington Beach City School District $159.85 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure R – Ocean View School District $169 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure S – Orange Unified School District $288 Million Facilities Bond
- No on Measure T – Westminster School District $76 Million Facilities Bond
- Yes on Measure U – Anaheim 2/3 Vote of the Council to Propose Taxes (Instead of Simple Majority)
- No on Measure Y Costa Mesa initiative to amend Municipal Code to require voter approval of certain changes in land use, retroactive to July 17, 2015
- No on Measure HH – Fountain Valley 1% Sales Tax Increase (from 8% to 9%)
- No on Measure JJ – La Palma 1% Sales Tax Increase (from 8% to 9%)
- No on Measure LL – Laguna Beach 2% Hotel Tax Increase (from 10% to 12%)
- Yes on Measure MM – Newport Beach 5/7 Vote of the Council to Propose Taxes (Instead of Simple Majority)
- No on Measure OO – San Clemente 3% Hotel Tax Increase (from 10% to 13%)
- No on Measure PP – Santa Ana 700% Pay Raise for City Council (from $125/mtg to $1000/mo for Council and $200/mtg to $1000/mo for Mayor)
- Yes on Measure QQ – Stanton 1% Sales Tax Repeal (from 9% to 8%)
- No on Measure SS – Westminster 1% Sales Tax Increase (from 8% to 9%)
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in Aliso Viejo, Anaheim, Anaheim City School District, Brea Olinda Unified School District, Capistrano Unified School District, Centralia School District, Costa Mesa, Dana Point, Fountain Valley, Fountain Valley School District, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Garden Grove Unified School District, Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach City School District, Irvine, La Habra, La Palma, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Lake Forest, Los Alamitos, Mesa Consolidated Water District, Moulton-Niguel Water District, Newport Beach, Ocean View School District, Orange, Orange County Water District, Orange Unified School District, Rancho Santa Margarita, San Clemente, Santa Ana, Santa Ana Unified School District, Stanton, Tustin, Westminster, Westminster School District, Yorba Linda, Yorba Linda Water District | Tagged: Allan Bernstein, Allan Mansoor, Andrew Hall, Andy Hall, Angie Cano, Anthony Kuo, Austin Lumbard, Bob Kiley, Bruce Whitaker, Carol Gamble, Cathy Green, Charles E. "Chuck" Puckett, Christina L. Shea, Christina Shea, Chuck Puckett, Craig Young, Dan Bane, Dawn Holthouser, Dean Grose, Don Wagner, Duane Cave, Dwight Robinson, Eugene Hernandez, Francisco Barajas, Gary Melton, Gene Hernandez, Jake Vollebregt, James R. Fisler, Janine Heft, Jerry Slusiewicz, Jim Fisler, Jim Reardon, Joe Carchio, John Mark Jennings, Kimberly Ho, Larry Bennett, Laura Ferguson, Laurie Davies, Lee Lowrey, Lee Ramos, Lucille Kring, Lyn Semeta, Lynn Semeta, Mark Lopez, Mark Murphy, Measure HH, Measure J, Measure JJ, Measure K, Measure LL, Measure M, Measure MM, Measure N, Measure O, Measure OO, Measure P, Measure PP, Measure Q, Measure QQ, Measure R, Measure S, Measure SS, Measure T, Measure U, Measure Y, Michelle Brough, Mike Munzing, Patrick Brenden, Ric Collett, Ryan Bent, Steve A. Nagel, Steve Jones, Steve Mensinger, Steve Nagel, Steven Nguyen, Tara Campbell, Tim Shaw, Tom Beamish, Tony Beall, Wendy Shrove, Will O'Neill | 2 Comments »
Posted by Chris Nguyen on February 18, 2015
The hearing in the North Orange County Community College District Measure J case is slated to be heard this morning. After the initial count showed Measure J winning by a very narrow margin (34 “yes” votes need to be tossed for J to fail), Opponents of Measure J launched a recount in order to examine the provisional ballots cast in the election. Measure J is a $574 million bond measure.
They found 42 provisional ballots that weren’t signed by the voter and “identified hundreds of signatures [on absentee and provisional ballots] that a reasonable person could not identify as similar to the signature on the voter registration card.”
With a four-year-old state law making it harder to toss ballots in a recount, very few recounts (if any) have overturned the results of an election in California. Indeed, in Orange County, no recount since then has managed to change any winner’s vote margin.
Former Senator Lou Correa has not yet filed his lawsuit in the First Supervisorial District Special Election, but I would suspect that is because his camp is keeping a close eye on the Measure J hearing. When not even a single vote changed in the recount, leaving Andrew Do in office as the new Supervisor, Correa switched to examining provisional ballots (i.e. the Measure J opponents’ strategy).
If the Measure J opponents prove wildly successful in tossing ballots, that’d be a good sign for Correa. If the Measure J opponents fail to toss ballots, that’d be a bad sign for Correa. If Measure J opponents barely prevail in that ballot tossing effort, then Correa’s camp needs to carefully scrutinize whether they have enough ballots to toss to make a difference. Measure J opponents only need to toss 34 ballots out of 154,118 cast. Correa needs to toss 43 ballots out of 48,339 cast (technically, 48,626 ballots were cast in the First Supervisorial District Special Election, but those 287 voters who cast blank ballots aren’t likely to matter; had a bunch of them been Correa undervotes, we would have heard about it by now).
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in 1st Supervisorial District, North Orange County Community College District | Tagged: Andrew Do, Lou Correa, Measure J | 6 Comments »
Posted by Chris Nguyen on February 10, 2015
One of the last times we’ll use this graphic of Supervisor Andrew Do (R-Westminster), former Senator Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana), Councilman Chris Phan (R-Garden Grove), Chuyen Van Nguyen (NPP-Garden Grove), and Lupe Morfin-Moreno (R-Santa Ana)
After recounting 6,250 ballots in 16 precincts (12.85% of all ballots cast and 15.84% of all precincts) in the First Supervisorial District, no ballots changed.
Correa has opted to suspend the recount to instead focus on provisional ballots, a strategy suggested in a colorful post by Orange Juice Blogger Greg Diamond.
Diamond cited the effort to overturn the North Orange County Community College District’s Measure J in which the measure’s opponents initiated the recount but focused on gathering information about the provisional ballots in order to challenge the provisionals in court. Their court date is Wednesday, February 18.
However, Measure J opponents have a much shorter road to victory than Correa does.
Simple math explains this: Measure J opponents need to toss 34 out of 154,118 (0.02206%) votes cast. Correa needs to toss 43 out of 48,626 (0.08843%) votes cast.
Measure J opponents also have the advantage of a multicounty district: they can challenge ballots in the LA County portion of the North Orange County Community College District (that district really needs a name change for the sake of geographic accuracy). Correa can only challenge ballots in Orange County.
The history books are about to be written on the First Supervisorial District Special Election.
| County Supervisor First District, Short Term |
| Completed Precincts: 101 of 101 |
|
Vote Count |
Percentage |
| ANDREW DO |
18,905 |
39.1% |
| LOU CORREA |
18,862 |
39.0% |
| CHRIS PHAN |
7,857 |
16.3% |
| CHUYEN VAN NGUYEN |
1,879 |
3.9% |
| LUPE MORFIN-MORENO |
834 |
1.7% |
| MARK I. LOPEZ (W) |
2 |
0.0% |
Yesterday, Registrar of Voters Neal Kelley sent out this unintentionally symbolic tweet, as political eyes turn away from the First Supervisorial District Special Election and toward the 37th Senate District Special Election:
It’s only 35 days until the SD-37 Special Election, and the first mailer should arrive in my mailbox any day now.
Time to start focusing on this trio of Republicans: Business Owner/Assemblyman Donald P. Wagner, former Orange County Supervisor John M. W. Moorlach, and Naz Namazi
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in 1st Supervisorial District, 37th Senate District, North Orange County Community College District | Tagged: Andrew Do, Chris Phan, Chuyen Van Nguyen, Don Wagner, John Moorlach, Lou Correa, Lupe Moreno, Lupe Morfin-Moreno, Mark I. Lopez, Measure J, Naz Namazi, Neal Kelley | 8 Comments »
Posted by Chris Nguyen on February 3, 2015
Supervisor’s Chief/Businessowner Andrew Do (R-Westminster), California State Senator Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana), Councilmember/Deputy DA Chris Phan (R-Garden Grove), Television News Anchor Chuyen Van Nguyen (NPP-Garden Grove), and Office Specialist Lupe Morfin-Moreno (R-Santa Ana)
Last night, former Senator Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana) submitted an official request for a recount to the Orange County Registrar of Voters. Judging by recent recount efforts, it is highly unlikely that Correa will be able to overturn Supervisor-Elect Andrew Do’s 43-vote lead.
- In the 2014 general election for the North Orange County Community College District’s Measure J, measure opponents needed to flip 34 votes to block the 55% supermajority to overturn the measure. Realizing a recount would be unlikely to prevail, the opponents went with the unique method of using the recount as an opportunity to examine the provisional ballots, then ended the recount to instead file suit in court to get the provisionals tossed. This case is still pending. However, since provisionals overwhelmingly favored Correa, it is unlikely he would use this method (nor would adding the uncounted provisionals help since there were just a handful of those, so it was far short of 43).
- In the 2014 general election for Mayor of Garden Grove, then-Mayor Bruce Broadwater (D-Garden Grove) sought a recount to overturn his 15-vote re-election loss to then-School Board Member Bao Nguyen (D-Garden Grove). Broadwater threw in the towel when the first day of the recount failed to change a single ballot despite 2,500 ballots being recounted, and Nguyen became Mayor.
- In the 2014 primary election for State Controller, then-Assembly Speaker John Perez (D-Los Angeles) sought a recount to overturn his 481-vote loss to then-Board of Equalization Member Betty Yee (D-San Francisco). Perez gave up after one week when he only managed to change 8 votes in approximately 400 precincts. Yee advanced to the general election against Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearengin and won that race to become State Controller.
- In the 2007 special election for the First Supervisorial District (i.e. the election for this same seat eight years ago when none other than Lou Correa resigned the seat to become a State Senator), then-School Board Member Trung Nguyen (R-Garden Grove) led then-Councilwoman Janet Nguyen (R-Garden Grove) by 7 votes. Janet Nguyen then sought a recount and netted 14 votes, thereby changing her 7-vote deficit into a 7-vote lead. Trung Nguyen then went to court and widdled Janet Nguyen’s lead down to 3 votes. Janet Nguyen, of course, went on to serve eight years in the seat before resigning in 2014 to become a State Senator, triggering the 2015 special election. One important caveat in this story, state laws regarding recounts were much more generous in allowing ballots to be tossed back then, and even that was only a 14-vote (or 11-vote if you consider the judge’s rulings) switch.
Do’s 43-vote victory is simply too large a margin for Correa to overcome. I don’t blame Correa for trying, because 43 votes out of 48,626 cast in 101 precincts is tantalizingly close, but he just won’t be able to pull it off.
Do will be sworn in as Supervisor this morning.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in 1st Supervisorial District, California, Garden Grove, North Orange County Community College District | Tagged: Andrew Do, Bao Nguyen, Betty Yee, Bruce Broadwater, Chris Phan, Chuyen Van Nguyen, John Perez, Lou Correa, Lupe Moreno, Lupe Morfin-Moreno, Measure J, Recount | 4 Comments »
Posted by Chris Nguyen on December 11, 2014
Fullerton activist Tony Bushala filed an official request for a recount on Measure J, the $574 million bond in the two-county North Orange County Community College District (NOCCCD). As a college bond, Measure J requires 55% voter approval to pass.
The LA County Registrar of Voters posted their official notice of recount and an LA County recount costs a shocking $5,074.71-$21,158.49 per day. Orange County has a much more reasonable $600 per day.
NOCCCD has 16 precincts in LA County, where 3,947 votes were cast. NOCCCD has 522 precincts in Orange County, where 150,171 votes were cast.
Much chatter has been on the recount starting in LA County, as LA County Registrar Dean Logan is believed to be more likely to have erroneous counts than the very competent Orange County Registrar Neal Kelley. Indeed, the OC Registrar recount in the Garden Grove Mayor’s race was cancelled after one day because not a single ballot changed. (Dean Logan’s role in the 2004 Washington Governor’s race was particularly high profile, as the Republican Dino Rossi led for Governor of Washington in multiple recounts until Logan’s King County found a bunch of ballots for Democrat Christine Gregoire. Logan left King County to become LA County’s Chief Deputy Registrar in 2006 and became LA County’s Registrar in 2008.)
La Habra Heights (LA County) and Yorba Linda (Orange County) are the strongholds of the “No” vote, where most voters opposed Measure J. Orange County’s Stanton, Anaheim, Buena Park, Garden Grove, Los Alamitos, and La Habra are the strongholds of the “Yes” vote, as are the unincorporated areas of both counties; voters in these areas voted in favor of Measure J by margins exceeding 55%. OC’s Fullerton, Placentia, La Palma, Cypress, Brea, and unincorporated Rossmoor, along with LA County’s Whittier are the closer areas, where Measure J got over 50% but less than the 55% supermajority.
| City/Community |
Yes |
No |
| La Mirada |
1 |
100.00% |
0 |
0.00% |
| Stanton |
2265 |
65.94% |
1170 |
34.06% |
| Orange |
13 |
65.00% |
7 |
35.00% |
| Anaheim |
19645 |
60.51% |
12821 |
39.49% |
| Buena Park |
6942 |
59.06% |
4813 |
40.94% |
| Garden Grove |
2768 |
58.62% |
1954 |
41.38% |
| Los Alamitos |
1383 |
57.01% |
1043 |
42.99% |
| Seal Beach |
1287 |
55.40% |
1036 |
44.60% |
| Unincorporated LA County |
831 |
55.40% |
669 |
44.60% |
| La Habra |
2449 |
55.23% |
1985 |
44.77% |
| Unincorporated OC (Excluding Rossmoor) |
3698 |
55.11% |
3012 |
44.89% |
| Fullerton |
14308 |
54.74% |
11829 |
45.26% |
| Placentia |
5562 |
54.32% |
4678 |
45.68% |
| La Palma |
1819 |
53.63% |
1573 |
46.37% |
| Cypress |
5675 |
52.68% |
5098 |
47.32% |
| Brea |
4997 |
52.59% |
4504 |
47.41% |
| Whittier |
620 |
52.28% |
566 |
47.72% |
| Rossmoor |
1804 |
50.73% |
1752 |
49.27% |
| La Habra Heights |
577 |
45.79% |
683 |
54.21% |
| Yorba Linda |
8136 |
44.51% |
10145 |
55.49% |
| TOTAL |
84780 |
55.01% |
69338 |
44.99% |
Math should be a nonpartisan issue, so in the spirit of this, I’ll concur with Greg Diamond’s math that overturning Measure J requires tossing 34 “Yes” votes at Orange Juice Blog.
However, I understand why the OC Register states Measure J passed by 15 votes. With 154,118 votes cast, 55% is 84,765 votes. Measure J got 15 votes more: 84,780. That does not mean that 15 votes is how to defeat Measure J.
Somehow moving 16 votes from the Yes column to the No column would defeat Measure J. However, that would be a tall order, as that would literally require the vote counting machines to have counted “No” votes as “Yes” votes 16 times. That seems rather unlikely, with the increased accuracy of vote counting machines in recent years.
The more likely way to defeat Measure J in the recount would be for 34 “Yes” votes to be tossed, as Diamond’s math explains. His math and mine agree, but here’s a table that presents it in a different method that may help those confused by Diamond’s description:
| “Yes” Votes Tossed |
Yes |
No |
Total |
55% |
| 0 |
84780 |
55.0097976874862% |
69338 |
44.9902023125138% |
154118 |
84765 |
| 1 |
84779 |
55.0095057651005% |
69338 |
44.9904942348995% |
154117 |
84765 |
| 2 |
84778 |
55.0092138389265% |
69338 |
44.9907861610735% |
154116 |
84764 |
| 3 |
84777 |
55.0089219089641% |
69338 |
44.9910780910359% |
154115 |
84764 |
| 4 |
84776 |
55.0086299752132% |
69338 |
44.9913700247868% |
154114 |
84763 |
| 5 |
84775 |
55.0083380376737% |
69338 |
44.9916619623263% |
154113 |
84763 |
| 6 |
84774 |
55.0080460963455% |
69338 |
44.9919539036545% |
154112 |
84762 |
| 7 |
84773 |
55.0077541512287% |
69338 |
44.9922458487713% |
154111 |
84762 |
| 8 |
84772 |
55.0074622023230% |
69338 |
44.9925377976770% |
154110 |
84761 |
| 9 |
84771 |
55.0071702496285% |
69338 |
44.9928297503715% |
154109 |
84760 |
| 10 |
84770 |
55.0068782931451% |
69338 |
44.9931217068549% |
154108 |
84760 |
| 11 |
84769 |
55.0065863328726% |
69338 |
44.9934136671274% |
154107 |
84759 |
| 12 |
84768 |
55.0062943688111% |
69338 |
44.9937056311889% |
154106 |
84759 |
| 13 |
84767 |
55.0060024009604% |
69338 |
44.9939975990396% |
154105 |
84758 |
| 14 |
84766 |
55.0057104293205% |
69338 |
44.9942895706795% |
154104 |
84758 |
| 15 |
84765 |
55.0054184538912% |
69338 |
44.9945815461088% |
154103 |
84757 |
| 16 |
84764 |
55.0051264746726% |
69338 |
44.9948735253274% |
154102 |
84757 |
| 17 |
84763 |
55.0048344916646% |
69338 |
44.9951655083354% |
154101 |
84756 |
| 18 |
84762 |
55.0045425048670% |
69338 |
44.9954574951330% |
154100 |
84755 |
| 19 |
84761 |
55.0042505142798% |
69338 |
44.9957494857202% |
154099 |
84755 |
| 20 |
84760 |
55.0039585199029% |
69338 |
44.9960414800971% |
154098 |
84754 |
| 21 |
84759 |
55.0036665217363% |
69338 |
44.9963334782637% |
154097 |
84754 |
| 22 |
84758 |
55.0033745197799% |
69338 |
44.9966254802201% |
154096 |
84753 |
| 23 |
84757 |
55.0030825140336% |
69338 |
44.9969174859664% |
154095 |
84753 |
| 24 |
84756 |
55.0027905044973% |
69338 |
44.9972094955027% |
154094 |
84752 |
| 25 |
84755 |
55.0024984911709% |
69338 |
44.9975015088291% |
154093 |
84752 |
| 26 |
84754 |
55.0022064740545% |
69338 |
44.9977935259455% |
154092 |
84751 |
| 27 |
84753 |
55.0019144531478% |
69338 |
44.9980855468522% |
154091 |
84751 |
| 28 |
84752 |
55.0016224284509% |
69338 |
44.9983775715491% |
154090 |
84750 |
| 29 |
84751 |
55.0013303999637% |
69338 |
44.9986696000363% |
154089 |
84749 |
| 30 |
84750 |
55.0010383676860% |
69338 |
44.9989616323140% |
154088 |
84749 |
| 31 |
84749 |
55.0007463316179% |
69338 |
44.9992536683821% |
154087 |
84748 |
| 32 |
84748 |
55.0004542917591% |
69338 |
44.9995457082409% |
154086 |
84748 |
| 33 |
84747 |
55.0001622481098% |
69338 |
44.9998377518902% |
154085 |
84747 |
| 34 |
84746 |
54.9998702006698% |
69338 |
45.0001297993302% |
154084 |
84747 |
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in North Orange County Community College District | Tagged: Measure J | 11 Comments »
Posted by Chris Nguyen on November 14, 2014
In the latest numbers from the Orange County Registrar of Voters, Measure J has 55.1%, appearing to break the necessary 55% for the half-billion dollar bond to pass. Supporters rejoiced and opponents despaired.
J-North Orange County Community College District,
Fullerton/Cypress Colleges Bond Measure |
| Completed Precincts: 522 of 522 |
|
Vote Count |
Percentage |
| Bonds – Yes |
82,060 |
55.1% |
| Bonds – No |
66,968 |
44.9% |
| |
Both have responded prematurely. Here’s why:
NO ORANGE CO COMM COLL SP MEASURE J
Los Angeles County Results Only
| Measure J |
|
Votes |
Percent |
| COLLEGE IMPROVEMENT BONDS |
|
|
|
| YES |
|
1,790 |
51.44 |
| NO |
|
1,690 |
48.56 |
| Registration |
11,729 |
| Precincts Reporting* |
16 |
| Total Precincts |
16 |
| % Precincts Reporting |
100 |
Despite being named the North Orange County Community College District, part of the district is in LA County. Even the Orange County Register forgot.
While Orange County has given daily updates, LA County hasn’t updated since Monday. Measure J supporters and opponents will be left waiting for LA County to find out the fate of that bond.
Here are what the numbers look like when combining Orange and LA County:
| Measure J |
Votes |
Percent |
| Yes |
83,850 |
54.98% |
| No |
68,658 |
45.02% |
With Orange County nearly done counting (if not today, certainly by Monday), LA County is going to determine the fate of Measure J.
Here’s how the district broke down.
Here are the cities where Measure J broke 55%:
| City |
Yes |
No |
| Stanton |
2247 |
65.88% |
1164 |
34.12% |
| Orange |
13 |
65.00% |
7 |
35.00% |
| Anaheim |
19593 |
60.48% |
12802 |
39.52% |
| Buena Park |
6918 |
59.03% |
4801 |
40.97% |
| Garden Grove |
2761 |
58.60% |
1951 |
41.40% |
| Los Alamitos |
1342 |
57.16% |
1006 |
42.84% |
| Seal Beach |
1262 |
55.72% |
1003 |
44.28% |
| La Habra |
4493 |
55.29% |
3633 |
44.71% |
| |
Here are the cities and unincorporated areas where Measure J failed to break 55% (I’d note Yorba Linda outright voted against Measure J, with 55.52% against the Measure, unlike in the other areas where Measure J fell short of the 55% supermajority but still broke 50%, though Rossmoor is virtually dead even):
| City/Area |
Yes |
No |
| Unincorporated OC (Excluding Rossmoor) |
1580 |
54.67% |
1310 |
45.33% |
| Fullerton |
14059 |
54.60% |
11692 |
45.40% |
| Placentia |
5549 |
54.35% |
4660 |
45.65% |
| La Palma |
1789 |
53.50% |
1555 |
46.50% |
| Cypress |
5615 |
52.59% |
5061 |
47.41% |
| Brea |
4992 |
52.59% |
4500 |
47.41% |
| Los Angeles County |
1790 |
51.44% |
1690 |
48.56% |
| Rossmoor |
1744 |
50.49% |
1710 |
49.51% |
| Yorba Linda |
8103 |
44.48% |
10113 |
55.52% |
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in North Orange County Community College District | Tagged: Measure J | 3 Comments »
OC Political 