This came over the wire from Supervisor Bill Campbell’s office on Friday…
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Newsletter Reprint on April 29, 2012
This came over the wire from Supervisor Bill Campbell’s office on Friday…
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in 3rd Supervisorial District | Tagged: Bill Campbell | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Brenda Higgins on April 29, 2012
There is a facebook page promoting a recall effort of the 3 council members who voted last week to terminate the 42 year relationship between the Brea Police Department and the Orange County Sherrif. I have at other posts on OC Political, expressed what I know and my thoughts about how this vote to terminate the contract with Brea PD came about, so I will try not belaver those things further. However, the debate rages on, with not uncommon alignments. There is still the Pro-Brea PD facebook page I mentioned earlier, which now invites its readers to visit the Recall page. While the Recall page gained pretty a pretty rapidly expanding fan base in the first few hours it was up, it’s growth and popularity seems to have sputtered.
Two of the three who made this decision, (again from prior posts on OC Political, note that these three are the majority controlling vote on every issue, systematically vote together and annihilate any opposition) are up for election in November.
Schwing and Rikel have made it public that they will seek re-election, in November 2012. That is only 7 months from now, and in a Presidential election year, voter turnout should be high. Even before their vote on the Police contract last week, they both were touting their accomplishments as “fiscal conservatives” in seeking a competitive bid process for the police services. The writing has been on that wall for years now. Mr. Anderson and his cohorts have made their agenda to replace Brea PD with OC Sheriff no secret. Also not surprising in the “competitive” bid process, Anaheim PD, cheaper than Brea, closer than the Sheriff, already staffed and housed in close proximinty to Yorba Linda, received no votes. Competitive bid process indeed.
John Anderson, the third vote on awarding the contract to the Sheriff, was just elected to his second term in November 2010. He was the top vote getter in that race, just 18 months ago.
I am hearing rumors of a referendum in the works, but have seen no actual information, website, literature or anyone claiming responsibility.
I can not imagine where a Recall effort will go. The voters in Yorba Linda, as in many local political climates, have a fairly short attention span. While this is a shocking development to many, there are those who are as enthusiastically bidding Brea PD farewell. The usual political actives in town have been very vocal and involved, attending and speaking at every meeting, but those usual disgruntled few, do not a Recall make. There is also no bank roll for any of this Recall/Referendum effort as we have seen in other successful local recalls.
My disclaimer is this, I lost in that November 2010 election to John Anderson. I have a tremendous dislike for his politics, what has seemed like a clearly personal agenda on every issue, and the thug politics tactics employed by his supporters. During that campaign I was daily contacted by residents who vowed their vote but for a variety of reasons would not in any way publicly disclose support of someone other than Anderson. The reasons ranged from being an employee in the same County department as Anderson, needing a variance or permit, or road work in their neighborhood, to having a client or customer who was a member of the YLRRR, being afraid of losing a contract or funding from the city, the list goes on. The agressive retribution of this group has been well known.
John Anderson was however, elected by a clear margin and in this situation with the police contract vote, I see no evidence of wrongoding, nothing illegal or unethical in the maner in which this vote came about. I think it was inappropriate, somewhat underhanded, and am sad that Brea Police were not treated as a team member and efforts made to improve the relationship, service and shared economics. It is also amazing to me that 3 elected officials in the course of one 5 hour meeting can award a five year, $10 million contract, but there is no evidence that any legal bar exists to prevent it. This self serving behavior and tactics have been par for the course with John Anderson’s cohorts and any candidates of the YLRRR, but Recall?
At the time of the 2010 election in spite of the ample evidence that this was the manner in which these council members would continue to, and had done business in this city, Anderson was re-elected. Since he and his companions have dominated the council, the city has been through 4 city managers, rewritten a long standing contract and replaced the city attorneys, (Again, no secret that Anderson intended to and did replace the prior law firm with one of his choosing) and in general they have micromanaged and criticized every city department and/or contract that was in place when they came to power. A wholesale effort to replace anyone and everyone who was not “one-of-us” was undertaken. We as a city, elected and re-elected them.
To me, a recall effort only furthers the dissention and distrust that currently exists in and with our city government. The inflammatory histrionics that necessarily come with a recall effort are going to be much like scratching an open wound. I won’t support any recall. I don’t like this council, but we have the government we elected. Sore losers are neither effective or persuasive and responding to thug politics with more thug politics is disrespectful to the process, and something we should be working to avoid and not encourage.
The contract with Brea PD does not end until May 2013. There will have to be determinations about transistions and logistics. I am eager to see how these things pan out and watch as the Sheriff attempts to implement their very enthusiastic and overly ambitious proposals, including setting up a whole new station while saving the city over a million dollars each year over the next 5 years.
If the costs are amortized over the life of the contract, then who bears the actual start up costs? The simple answer would be the County. As a resident of Yorba Linda, I am also a resident of the county right? So, I pick up the tab either way. It just seems that now, when there’s an overrun, my neighbors in the farther corners of the county are going to help me pick up the tab. I sure appreciate that.
I also wish that all the Sheriff fans would stop talking about all the impressive special forces and technology the Sheriff will bring to Yorba Linda. Please carefully read the proposal, most of those impressive services we already had access to. Nothing new, not a bonus, we already were getting them as county residents.
I understand there is another city staff report in the works, presumably related to implementation and transition. I have not been able to get the links on the city website to work, but the information, the staff report when it’s done and an agenda for the upcoming meeting are always found there on the city website. The next Council meeting is Tuesday evening May 1, in the City Council Chambers. Public Comment on non-agenda items is generally first. If you have something to say to your elected officials, you should get there early and plan on staying for the duration. It is not uncommon for these meetings to go well past midnight. This issue of the police contract has garnered a good deal of public input. Pretty much all of it ignored, but if you want to exercise your right to say something, it is there for you to exercise.
Be clear on the fact that in November, there are 3 seats open on the Yorba Linda city council. Anderson is safe. Shwing and Rikel are incumbents running again, but could be replaced. Winder is termed out, so his seat is open. If we follow the trend of blindly re-electing incumbents, we will have the same exact council we have now, the 3 who control and 2 who should just stay home because their vote and their presence does not matter. Imagine this, we could also elect 3 independent thinkers, unalligned with any political action committee and citizens might then have an atual voice with the goings on in our city. If you were one of the majority of the supporters of Brea PD who attended the meeting last Thursday, you know what it is like to be ignored. Vote and support independent candidates who are not owned by YLRRR, this seems the only viable option at this point, but whether residents will actually stand up and speak up remains to be seen.
Posted in Yorba Linda | Tagged: Anderson, Brea Police, OCSD, Rikel, Schwing, Yorba Linda City Council, yorba linda police | 11 Comments »
Posted by Newsletter Reprint on April 29, 2012
This came over the wire from the Registrar of Voters’ office on Friday…
Sample Ballot Mailing
Look For Your Sample Ballot Soon
Thousands of sample ballots are arriving at our warehouse daily. Our first two ballot styles contain nearly 150,000 sample ballots, which will be the first to be mailed. Our mailing will begin next week.
Neal Kelley
Registrar of Voters
Small Changes, Big Advantage
We have developed a new election supply box for polling places. This new box has an attached lid and will increase packing efficiencies. This will also assist poll workers as they unpack and pack critical election supplies.<!–Read more >–>
Online Training Grows
For the third election in a row our custom online poll worker training tool continues to be the choice for experienced poll workers. Online training will begin May 4th and contains new features, such as expanded video tutorials.<!–Read more >–>
Poll Workers 1,116 | VBMs Mailed: 0 | VBMs Returned: 0
Vote-by-Mail Ballot Processing Begins
Yesterday we began the process of inserting 600,000 permanent vote-by-mail ballots. These ballots will be delivered to voters beginning May 7th. Our first run (shown at left) contains 30,000 ballots. Each day we will insert nearly 50,000 as we move towards May 7th.
Posted in Orange County | Tagged: Orange County Registrar of Voters | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Newsletter Reprint on April 28, 2012
This came over the wire from the Registrar of Voters’ office on Thursday…
Off and Running
April 26, 2012 – Today we began the process of inserting vote-by-mail ballots. We will begin to mail these ballots to permanent vote-by-mail voters starting on May 7th. Our printing process started yesterday – a process that will take a little over a week – with a planned printing schedule of 600,000 permanent vote-by-mail ballots. Today we inserted 9,478 ballots (a process that makes the ballot mail ready). Over the next few days we should be close to 50,000 per day.
Posted in Orange County | Tagged: Orange County Registrar of Voters | 1 Comment »
Posted by Newsletter Reprint on April 28, 2012
This came over the wire from Assemblyman Chris Norby’s office on Thursday…
NORBY NOTESAPRIL, 2012 | ISSUE 09
THIS ISSUE
Posted in 65th Assembly District | Tagged: Chris Norby | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Newsletter Reprint on April 28, 2012
This came across the wire from the office of Assemblywoman Diane Harkey:
Lemon Law Derailed by Legislature
Budget Crisis and Popular Opinion Do Not Sway Committee Members, Spending Binge Continues Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in 73rd Assembly District | Tagged: Diane Harkey | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Newsletter Reprint on April 28, 2012
This just came across the wire from the Hayden for Congress campaign:
Influential Family Action PAC Endorses
Orange County Financial Expert Jerry Hayden’s Campaign for Congressional District 46
(Santa Ana,CA) – Today, the Hayden for Congress campaign announced the endorsement of Family Action PAC. This endorsements adds a formidable presence to the already momentous campaign finance team, and brings a wealth of relationships with Orange County’s donor base. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in 46th Congressional District | Tagged: Jerry Hayden | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Chris Nguyen on April 27, 2012
(UPDATED at 6:31 with recap.)
Wow. The Anaheim Union trustees are in a rather contentious battle to appoint their fifth member to succeed the late Jan Harp Domene.
It takes three votes to appoint.
Jordan Brandman (D-Anaheim) nominated Greg Domene (D-Anaheim), with Anna Piercy (R-Cypress) voting for the nomination. Brian O’Neal (R-La Palma) and Katherine Smith (R-Anaheim) voted against. The Domene nomination fails on a 2-2 vote.
Brian O’Neal nominated John Alvis (R-Buena Park), with Katherine Smith voting for the nomination. Anna Piercy voted against. Jordan Brandman abstained. The Alvis nomination gets a 2-1-1 vote.
Anna Piercy nominated Annemarie Randle-Trejo (D-Anaheim), with Jordan Brandman and Brian O’Neal voting for the nomination. Katherine Smith voted against. The Randle-Trejo nomination gets a 3-1 vote.
Annemarie Randle-Trejo is appointed.
Recap: Brandman nominated Domene before any discussion. O’Neal and Smith are livid that a nomination has been made. Piercy finally seconds the motion.
Smith says she resented that Brandman made a nomination before there was any chance for discussion. She complained about misspelled applications and about an applicant who couldn’t distinguish between “there,” “their,” and “they’re” as well as “to,” “too,” and “two.”
O’Neal says there isn’t time to train someone because they need to know Robert’s Rules, the Brown Act, and No Child Left Behind. He says someone with experience is needed in these tough budget times.
Piercy implies there needs to be geographic diversity. She also says that there are many intelligent people, like engineers, who can’t spell.
Smith says she’s glad they’re able to debate in this discussion. She apologizes to Domene but argues that his qualifications did not match those of many other candidates; O’Neal concurs.
Brandman talks about his late mother and says his father carried on her legacy.
Smith and O’Neal emphasize experience over sentiment.
Posted in Anaheim Union High School District | Tagged: Anna Piercy, Annemarie Randle-Trejo, Brian O'Neal, Greg Domene, Jan Harp Domene, John Alvis, Jordan Brandman, Katherine Smith | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Former Blogger Chris Emami on April 27, 2012
If ever an issue existed that I never thought that I would have to post, this is the one. Apparently a Sizzler has caused a huge controversy in the City of Lake Forest.
Lake Forest Councilmember Scott Voigts has been on the right side of a lot of issues in Lake Forest and the Sizzler debacle is another one. Apparently Sizzler wanted to use an American theme to highlight the renovations of a restaurant along with an outdoor grilling area. Based on the sign ordinance on the books in Lake Forest the Planning Commission did not allow these specific requests.
Take a look at the article in the Lake Forest Patch here.
It appears that Councilmembers Scott Voigts and Marcia Rudolph joined with Sizzler in appealing the decision by the Planning Commission. According to this article in the Orange County Register here Councilmember Marcia Rudolph joined the other 2 Councilmembers in overturning this decision by the Planning Commission.
Sadly, Republican Councilmembers Peter Herzog and Mark Tettemer did not join their colleagues in overturning the decision. The Lake Forest Patch also provided a recap of the decision that you can read here.
Two letters representing different sides of this issue were submitted to the Lake Forest Patch on different sides of this issue:
Terry Anderson Lake Forest Planning Commissioner submitted this letter.
Scott Peotter Irvine Planning Commissioner submitted this letter.
The 3-2 decision by the council was a win for business friendly principles. Kudos go out to Republican Councilmembers Scott Voigts and Marcia Rudolph as well as Democrat Kathryn McCullough.
Posted in Lake Forest | Tagged: Kathryn McCullough, Marcia Rudolph, Mark Tettemer, Peter Herzog, Scott Peotter, Scott Voigts, Terry Anderson | 2 Comments »
Posted by Chris Nguyen on April 27, 2012
The Anaheim Union High School District is set to fill the vacancy from the untimely passing of Jan Harp Domene. The board is set to meet tonight at 5 PM to select which of the 13 applicants they will select to fill the seat.
It will take 3 votes to fill the seat, as the four AUHSD trustees need a majority vote to fill the fifth seat. The four AUHSD trustees are Board President Anna Piercy (R-Cypress) and Board Members Jordan Brandman (D-Anaheim), Brian O’Neal (R-La Palma), Katherine Smith (R-Anaheim). If the trustees fail to appoint anyone to the vacancy tonight, then that triggers the legal deadline that will force the seat to remain vacant until the November election, leaving the voters to decide who will fill the vacancy.
On Wednesday, in a five-hour meeting, the AUHSD trustees interviewed the 13 applicants. Each applicant was asked five questions:
From experienced volunteers to playng the race card to people who just know what’s going on when they walk into a building to people who couldn’t remember their own experiences to people who thought education was not the primary responsibility of the school district, the interviews had it all. Here are my summaries of what each candidate said:
The applicants include 7 Republicans, 4 Democrats, and 2 people registered as No Party Preference (known as Decline-to-State in pre-Prop 14 parlance).
They include 8 Anaheimers, 4 Buena Parkers, and 1 La Palman.
AUHSD includes the entirety of the City of Cypress, along with portions of Anaheim, Buena Park, La Palma and Stanton. AUHSD includes grades 7-12, with K-6 education provided by the Anaheim City School District, Centralia School District, Cypress School District, Magnolia School District, and Savanna School District.
(In the interest of full disclosure, I should note my day job is working in the Fullerton office of Assemblyman Chris Norby. Consequently, one of my co-workers is Jackie Filbeck, who is one of the candidates for the AUHSD seat.)
Posted in Anaheim Union High School District, Centralia School District, Cypress School District, Magnolia School District, Savanna School District | Tagged: Annemarie Randle-Trejo, Art Montez, Dominic Daddario, Forrest Turpen, Greg Domene, Helena De Coro, Jackie Filbeck, Jan Harp Domene, John Alvis, Kenneth Jenks, Lori Dinwiddie, Maureen Christensen, Rod Hall, Shanin Ziemer | Leave a Comment »