OC Political

A right-of-center blog covering local, statewide, and national politics

Union Money Invades Mission Viejo Council And Fifth District Supervisor Races

Posted by Greg Woodard on October 17, 2014

On Wednesday, I received a mailer from Citizens to Protect Mission Viejo.  On the front, calling itself the “Mission Viejo Taxpayers’ Voting Guide,” it asked for support for current council members Dave Leckness and Rhonda Reardon, and council candidate Wendy Bucknum.  On the back, it contrasts Board of Supervisor candidates Robert Ming and Lisa Bartlett, offering false facts (more about that later) about Ming, while recommending Bartlett.  (As I have consistently stated, I am supporting Ming in November)

The mailer was large, in full color, and on good paper stock, so I wondered how Citizens was paying for this apparently city-wide mailer.  My search at the Secretary of State and County websites came up empty, but I hit pay dirt at the City of Mission Viejo’s website (some are questioning whether Citizens was required to file with the County given that they are supporting a county-wide candidate).  On September 30, 2014, Citizens received a $5,000 donation from the Orange County Employees Association, and on October 10, 2014, it received a $13,000 donation from the Orange County Professional Firefighters Association, both public employee unions.

When I see public employee unions getting involved with Republican candidates, I get curious as to how the candidates feel about union money being spent on their behalf, particularly such a large donation from two well-known public employee unions.  Union money contributed directly to Republican candidates is a red flag for most conservatives (and would violate the candidate’s GOP pledge to not take union money if they signed it), so unions backing a Republican typically will make a contribution to a PAC that will then send a mail piece out as an independent expenditure.  Often candidates claim they have no control of independent expenditures so they can disclaim any responsibility yet still reap the benefits of the mailer.  So, I reached out to Leckness, Reardon, Bucknum, and Bartlett for comment.

To their credit, I received responses from Reardon (who signed the pledge) and Bucknum, both of whom stated that they did not know about the mailer until they received it on Wednesday, and both also stated that they have not been offered or taken any union money.  After giving the candidates 24 hours to respond, I have not heard back from Leckness or Bartlett.

While I recognize that all candidates and their supporters embellish their mailers, outright lies should not be tolerated.  Curiously, the PAC’s mailer repeats the same lie that Bartlett previously made against Ming falsely stating that Ming approved a loan to the City Manager at below market rates, when in fact Ming only voted for the loan on the condition that it be at prevailing market rates. (here)  Unfortunately, I did not hear back from Bartlett to address whether her campaign provided any information, including the false interest rate, to the PAC for the mailer.

The PAC mailer also suffers from a lie by omission.  While touting Bartlett as a fiscal conservative by noting her efforts to balance the budget and reduce pensions, the mailer conveniently ignores the fact that Ming, too, helped balance Laguna Niguel’s budget ever year that he has been on the Council.

Union money has become all to prevalent in national, state, and local politics.  The unions extort dues from their members and use that never-ending supply to support candidates who they believe will further their cause.  I know Reardon and Bucknum personally, and I take them at their word that they did not know anything about the union-backed mailer supporting them.  I also know that Bartlett has been willing to use false facts in an effort to smear Ming, and has not retracted any of those false press releases, even when faced with undeniable evidence of the false facts.  Bartlett also failed to respond to my questions about the PAC mailer that uses the same false information she previously used.  I leave it to the voters to decide who to trust in November.

13 Responses to “Union Money Invades Mission Viejo Council And Fifth District Supervisor Races”

  1. Dan Avery said

    So if I understand you correctly, it’s okay to loan a city employee over $900,000 at 3.75% interest with only 5% down? Are you freaking insane? That’s the taxpayer’s money. No bank has ever given a Jumbo loan for 3.75% at 5% down. Most banks want 20% down. What planet do you live on cause I need to move there and go into city government. Really, Greg, I knew you’d join Gilbert and his lunatics, but I didn’t know you’d given up critical thought. We both know exactly how nuts you’d all go if we did that for the city manager in Mission Viejo. Please!!! You guys are beyond desperate for someone to back and then end up hating when they don’t do exactly what Larry wants. Unbelievable. Attention City Employees we are not offering Jumbo loans at 3.75% with only 5% down. The line forms here.

  2. OCInsider#33 said

    I find it amazing that there is this expectation that candidates who are denied an endorsement by the OCGOP are still be expected to play by the OCGOP rule book. Not sure why you think that is going to fly. Of the group mentioned on the flier only Bucknum was endorsed? And she returned your call. Keep moving folks, nothing to see here.

  3. OCInsider #33. Time for wa fact check .Reardon and Bucknum were BOTH endorsed for Mission Viejo city council. Sure. Theose who benefitted form this $20,000 contribution to the MV PAC had no knowledge of this mass mailing. It only makes us work harder to get true fiscal conservatives and men of integrity elected

    • OCInsider#33 said

      I am obviously not keeping up with why the OCGOP is doing. But my point is still valid. Leckness and Barlett were not endorsed, why should they be expected to bow down to the Central Committee’s demands?

    • Frank Ury said

      Larry, I will let the Mission Viejo city manager know you are ok with us loaning him the money at 3.375% for a new home, he will be thrilled.

    • danavery said

      Frank, plus he only needs to but down 5%. He will be thrilled. Banks ask for 20% on Jumbo loans. I had no idea Larry and Francis were down with loaning money at below market rates to city employees.

  4. Joe said

    Bucknum is as phony as a $3.00 bill–with Carter’s picture in it. Bucknum is a sad example of what the present council majority are promoting.

    • danavery said

      Francis, I know you skipped college, but ad hominem arguments are a logical fallacy and they mean you’ve lost the argument. But, hey, thanks for trying. How’s it feel to be an outside agitator, by the way?

  5. […] Union Money Invades Mission Viejo Council And Fifth District Supervisor Races […]

  6. […] employee unions seem to be spending a lot of time and effort on Bartlett.  I recently received a mailer from a local PAC in support of Bartlett that smeared Ming with the same false facts that Bartlett […]

  7. danavery said

    So Greg, now that the “city manager” has called homes in the $850,000 price range “fixer uppers” are you still backing this Ming tool? I’m very curious. I mean just how much of this ring wing crack you gonna smoke?

  8. harry bridges said

    “The unions extort dues from their members and use that never-ending supply to support candidates who they believe will further their cause.” Really Greg? Extortion is illegal. Are you accusing unions of engaging in illegal activities? Basically, I came to this website to see who you guys endorse. This way I can vote the opposite!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: