A small protest is underway at the OC GOP Headquarters in Stanton against the Measure GG Sales Tax Increase on the November ballot. While the OC GOP has officially endorsed against Measure GG, the headquarters is being run by Stanton Councilman David Shawver, who has vocally advocated the Measure GG Sales Tax Increase.
Shawver is hosting a meeting for some delegates of the California Republican Party, as the state party convention is underway this weekend.
The protesters are objecting to an atmosphere of tax-and-spend by Republicans, led by Shawver. The protesters are also objecting to Measure GG’s sales tax increase that is 12.5% higher than the existing sales tax.
Additionally, the protesters have raised concerns that City resources are being used to promote the ballot measure, as can be seen on this page on the City of Stanton web site (in case the page gets taken down, OC Political has taken the liberty of archiving the page here) or this City press release.
The City of Stanton has argued that it has been cutting its budget to the bone since 2011, cutting $9 million from its general fund since then. The protesters have raised concerns about the adequacy of these cuts, citing the levels of salaries of City employees and citing pay raises granted during since 2011, when the City is asking the voters to increase the sales tax:
- $162,504: City Manager (15% pay raise in 2012)
- $141,312: Community Development Director (5% pay raises in 2011 and 2012)
- $134,580: Public Works Director/City Engineer
- $128,172: Administrative Services Director
- $122,076: Community Services Director (5% pay raise on August 12, 2014, just six months after becoming Community Services Director)
- $97,572: Accounting Manager
- $78,132: Code Enforcement/Parking Control Supervisor
- $78,132: Facilities Maintenance Supervisor (5% pay raise on April 22, 2014)
- $78,132: Associate Planner (5% pay raises in 2011, 2012, and 2013)
The full text of Measure GG is available from the Registrar of Voters (it’s the first 3.5 pages of the PDF). The City Attorney’s impartial analysis is on page 4. While the proponents of the Measure GG sales tax increase have dubbed it the “9-1-1/Public Safety and Essential City Services Protection Measure,” the impartial analysis notes, “The City would not be required to use the revenues raised by Measure GG for any special purpose or for any particular program or service.”
Pages 5-6 of the PDF from the Registrar has the argument in favor of GG, argument against GG, and the rebuttals to those two arguments.