OC Political

A right-of-center blog covering local, statewide, and national politics

Posts Tagged ‘Tom Tait’

BREAKING: Anaheim Reaches Agreement with Federal Government for Investigation of APD

Posted by Former Blogger Chris Emami on July 24, 2012

Over the weekend, Anaheim Mayor Tom Tait contacted the U.S. Attorney’s office and the State Attorney General’s office to ask that they launch full, independent investigations of the Anaheim Police shootings.

The federal prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney’s office told the City they would be willing to investigate.

Just moments ago, the Anaheim City Council voted unanimously to accept an offer from the U.S. Attorney’s office to conduct a “full investigation” of the Anaheim Police’s officer-involved shootings.

This is in addition to the Council’s action last month to have the City Manager hire an outside investigator to examine the Anaheim Police Department’s officer-involved shootings.

Posted in Anaheim | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Creating Wards In Anaheim Would Be A Mistake

Posted by Former Blogger Chris Emami on July 3, 2012

It has been brought to my attention that some misinformed people are pushing for a system that would separate Anaheim into different wards for the City Council races. I will disclose up front that I am a resident of Anaheim Hills and an appointed member of the Anaheim Housing Commission. The concept of putting wards in place is simply a waste of time and resources.

Only 3 other Cities use a Ward system in Orange County (Santa Ana, Newport Beach, and Seal Beach) and Santa Ana has a bizarre system where the entire City votes for the Councilmembers despite the fact that they have to live in the wards.

Anaheim currently has 4 members of the Council (including the Mayor) that live in Anaheim Hills and one minority on the Council. These members were all fairly elected to the Council by the entire City, whether you like them or not they and according to the 2010 Orange County Registrar of Voters Statement of Votes Kris Murray, Gail Eastman, and Tom Tait all won the area covered by the Anaheim Union High School District (http://www.ocvote.com/fileadmin/user_upload/sov/gen2010/sov-web.pdf).

Lets take a look back at the winning candidates for Anaheim City Council/Mayor going back to 2002:

2002- Curt Pringle, Bob Hernandez, & Richard Chavez (All 3 did not live in Anaheim Hills)
2004- Lorri Galloway & Harry Sidhu (Both do live in Anaheim Hills)
2006- Curt Pringle, Lucille Kring, &  Bob Hernandez (Only 1 lived in Anaheim Hills)
2008- Lorri Galloway & Harry Sidhu (Both do live in Anaheim Hills)
2010- Tom Tait, Kris Murray, & Gail Eastman (2 live in Anaheim Hills)
(All data comes from http://www.ocvote.com/)

These numbers show that both candidates from Anaheim Hills and the flatlands win races for the City Council and Mayor. It is not some conspiracy that has been put together to keep candidates on the City Council that only live in Anaheim Hills as 2010-2012 is the only time frame i the past 10 years where we have seen 4 Councilmembers living in Anaheim Hills.

Voters should  have a right to vote for the best candidates running for City Council regardless of where they live and what race that they are. In my opinion this not only should be the rule for Anaheim but any City including Santa Ana, Seal Beach, and Newport Beach.

Arguably the 2 front-runners for Anaheim City Council in November are Lucille Kring and Steve Chavez-Lodge (neither on lives in Anaheim Hills). Much like the stock market Councilmembers in terms of where they live are cyclical. Sometimes candidates from the flatlands win and other times candidates from the hills win.

I can’t believe that I am saying this but one of the better articles that I have seen on statistical reasoning against switching to a ward system comes from Gustavo Arellano at the OC Weekly who penned this http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/06/aclu_anaheim_lawsuit_latinos.php. He and I may not agree on much in terms of policy but he absolutely hit it out of the park with this story even though I don’t agree with some of the ways he expressed his position in the article.

Hopefully the system in Anaheim stays the same and we can continue to simply vote for candidates that will represent all of Anaheim not just their specific wards.

Posted in Anaheim | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments »

Adam Probolsky Article on Anaheim

Posted by Former Blogger Chris Emami on February 29, 2012

I enjoy reading Adam Probolsky’s writings in the Orange County Register. His recent article on Anaheim Mayor Tom Tait advocating for a culture of kindness at City Hall. Part of this is from a personality standpoint and another part is from the perspective of lessening regulation. Here is a copy of the article written by Adam:

Imagine if government employees were always friendly and habitually went out of their way to be helpful.

Imagine, if instead of requiring that you follow every rule and regulation, City Hall looked for ways to get you through bureaucratic processes more painlessly; even finding ways to circumvent odious, unreasonable or inapplicable red tape.

That is exactly what is happening in Anaheim.

At a recent meeting of young political staffers in Irvine, Anaheim Mayor Tom Tait spoke about the importance of advancing a kindness culture and regulatory relief. In office for just about a year, Tait is transforming the typical bureaucratic habits of City Hall into an entrepreneurial culture and customer-centric action.

Mayor Tait tells the story about a group of neighbors who wanted to have a Fourth of July parade on their street – an event that the neighbors hoped would create new relationships with the families (of significantly lower incomes) in an adjacent apartment complex.

The parade never got off the ground. The city planning staffer who handled their request informed them in detail of every obstacle (including permits, insurance requirements and public works equipment) required to block off the street. Oh, and don’t forget you’ll need to pay for a police presence…

The next time someone at City Hall gets a call about a small neighborhood parade, Mayor Tait says, “Staff should tell them to have a great time and maybe offer to bring the salsa.”

It is all about the core values of freedom and kindness. If it doesn’t meet the test of both, it probably isn’t a needed – or welcome – policy. Shortly after taking office as mayor, Tait started a regulatory relief task force; he wanted to “knock-off ordinances” that prevented job creation. “It is tough for California to compete with Arizona, but we can be the most free, most business friendly city in California,” said Mayor Tait.

Before Mayor Tait took office, an eager businessman submitted plans for a black-and-white themed car wash. City planning staff pushed back and suggested beige and…beige. “I don’t want to be in the business of crushing people’s dreams. Certainly not over theme colors at a job-creating business,” he said.

In addition to eliminating unnecessary laws, he handed down a directive (with the support of his colleagues on the City Council) that the staff was to use the broadest possible interpretation of laws – city staff is actually supposed to help applicants find loopholes, and help residents pay lower fees while meeting minimum interpretations of state and local regulations.

Kindness and the entrepreneurial spirit are not generally ingrained in the training process for people who work for government, so Tait worked to include city staff in the task force and in doing so gave them a stake in the process. Now, staff that ‘breaks the rules’ by doing something nice receive praise rather than reprimands.

One example: On a hot summer day, a security guard spotted an elderly resident sitting in the sun, waiting for a ride. The security guard (who worked in a city building nearby) drove the resident home after the resident’s ride failed to show. Under the old rules, the guard would certainly be chastised, probably punished and possibly even fired. Now, he gets a pat on the back and the confidence that he won’t be called out for doing the right thing.

All this is in sharp contrast to the direction the Irvine City Council is taking our city. A recent council decision authorized door-to-door searches for unlicensed pets. This is clearly a solution searching for a problem and a deeply anti-freedom move. Irvine’s Mayor Kang could learn a lot from Mayor Tait.

I asked Mayor Tait if he was promoting his concept to other cities. Half-jokingly, he first said he didn’t want the competition. But he further explained, “I just want Anaheim to be one step ahead of everyone else.”

Freelance columnist Adam Probolsky is a Turtle Rock resident and CEO of Probolsky Research LLC, which specializes in opinion research for government, corporate and political clients. He may be reached at adamprobolsky@gmail.com

Posted in Anaheim | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

OCEA Robocall Targets Anaheim Council’s Murray, Eastman, and Sidhu – Again

Posted by Chris Nguyen on February 28, 2012

OCEA had a Sunday, February 12 robocall and a Saturday, February 11 mailer targeting Anaheim Councilmembers Kris Murray, Gail Eastman, and Harry Sidhu.  The Anaheim Chamber dropped a Saturday, February 18 mailer defending the three Councilmembers.

Essentially, these robocalls and mailers are the result of a 3-2 Anaheim City Council (Mayor Tom Tait and Mayor Pro Tem Lorri Galloway dissenting) for a $158 million tax plan favoring GardenWalk Hotel I, LCC on January 24.  How the plan works in a nutshell is that GardenWalk Hotel I, LCC will retain 80% of the Transient Occupancy Tax money from the GardenWalk Hotel for the next 15 years.  (The Transient Occupancy Tax is known colloquially as the hotel bed tax.)  My post here explains the controversy.

Well, yesterday at 2:58 PM, the OCEA launched another robocall targetting Murray, Eastman, and Sidhu.  Read the transcript below or click to play:

Hello, I’m Larry Larsen, your Anaheim neighbor and local businessman.

If you want to tell Anaheim Councilmembers Murray, Eastman, and Sidhu it’s wrong to give wealthy corporate developers 158 million tax dollars while they cut public safety, libraries, and parks, now’s your chance: join us at Tuesday’s council meeting.

Tell them to give Anaheim citizens the right to vote and stop the giveaway.  Demand your vote!  Tell them to put it on the ballot.

Join me and our neighbors tomorrow: Tuesday, 4:30 PM, Anaheim City Hall, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard.

Paid for by Orange County Employees Association (714) 835-3355 HeartofAnaheim.com

This is the same Larry Larsen who did the last robocall.

It looks like Anaheim’s going to be embroiled in this $158 million controversy for the rest of this election year.

Posted in Anaheim | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

OCEA Hitting Anaheim Mailboxes as Well

Posted by Former Blogger Chris Emami on February 13, 2012

You may have read the article that Nguyen wrote this morning that had the OCEA robocall up urging people to show up to a townhall forum to discuss the recent vote that took place regarding the hotel tax subsidy.

It appears that answering machines are not their only mode of communication to the people of Anaheim as they are also trying to reach people through mail as well. I have already received three mailers prior to today, but unfortunately OC Political did not yet exist to pot the mailers up for all to see. Saturday I received the fourth mailer from OCEA, this time without a picture of John Leos on it and also targeting a totally separate issue.

Mailer looked as follows:

Clearly OCEA is targeting Anaheim in the November election with John Leos and a second candidate. This is a very opportune time to target the largest city on Orange County with Harry Sidhu and Lorri Galloway both termed out.

It appears that November campaign season has started earlier than expected which could make for a lot of mail.

Posted in Anaheim, Mail | Tagged: , , , , , , | 5 Comments »

OCEA Robocall Targeting Anaheim Council’s Murray, Eastman, and Sidhu

Posted by Chris Nguyen on February 13, 2012

Anaheim Councilmembers Kris Murray, Gail Eastman, and Harry Sidhu

At 5:16 PM yesterday, either my father, sister, or both received this robocall from the OCEA targeting Anaheim Councilmembers Kris Murray, Gail Eastman, and Harry Sidhu.  Click here to listen to the robocall or read the transcript below:

Hello, I’m Larry Larsen, your Anaheim neighbor and local businessman.

City Council Members Murray, Eastman, and Sidhu just voted to give away 158 million of our tax dollars to a hotel developer and campaign donor, instead of funding public safety, libraries, and parks.

Tell them they’re wrong.  Join us at KABC Channel 7’s town hall meeting tomorrow, Monday, 6 PM at St. Anthony’s Church, 1450 East La Palma Avenue.

Paid for by the Orange County Employees Association (714) 835-3355 HeartofAnaheim.com

Essentially, the Anaheim City Council voted 3-2 for a $158 million tax incentive for GardenWalk Hotel I, LCC on January 24.  How the plan works in a nutshell is that GardenWalk Hotel I, LCC will retain 80% of the Transient Occupancy Tax money from the GardenWalk Hotel for the next 15 years.  (The Transient Occupancy Tax is known colloquially as the hotel bed tax.)

Some opponents dislike the plan on the basis that it unfairly discriminates against other hotel operators in Anaheim who do not get the same tax incentive.  Other opponents dislike the plan on the basis that the $158 million could be spent on city government functions.  Some proponents of the plan argue that it will bring jobs to the city.  Other proponents argue that it will bring increased sales tax revenue and ensure future hotel bed tax revenue once the 15 years expires.

Mayor Tom Tait and Mayor Pro Tem Lorri Galloway voted against the plan while Councilmembers Eastman, Murray, and Sidhu voted for the plan.  Here is the City of Anaheim’s staff report, which recommended the Council oppose the tax incentive plan; Eastman, Murray, and Sidhu bucked the staff recommendation.  Here is the actual text of the new agreement between the City of Anaheim and GardenWalk Hotel I, LLC.

In 2004, OCEA made contributions to Galloway ($500 before the election and $500 after the election) and Sidhu ($500 after the election).  In 2005, OCEA made a $500 contribution to Galloway.  In 2008, OCEA made contributions to both Galloway and Sidhu’s re-election campaigns; they also made IEs on behalf of Galloway ($10,124.28) and Sidhu ($17,999.64).  In 2010, OCEA made contributions to Galloway’s Supervisorial campaign and to John Leos‘s City Council campaign; they also made IEs on behalf of Leos’s City Council campaign ($198,044.31) and against Shawn Nelson‘s Supervisorial campaign ($317,190.60; implicitly aiding Galloway and Sidhu’s Supervisorial campaigns).  Leos is running for Council in 2012.

Here is a January 24 OC Register article previewing the vote on the tax incentive plan.  Here’s a January 25 Voice of OC article describing the council vote.  Here’s a February 7 OC Register editorial arguing: “We don’t make a habit of begrudging lawmakers for cutting taxes, in most cases we welcome it, but only in instances where it is applied fairly – across the board. By approving a tax benefit that only applies to select hotels, the city puts other hotels at a competitive disadvantage. It’s political favoritism with severe economic consequences.”

I’m assuming the narrator of the robocall is the same Larry Larsen of Anaheim Hills who’s quoted in this January 31 OC Register article about the plan.

The robocall showed up on my father’s answering machine from what his caller ID deemed an “out of area” phone number.  My sister is in the Peace Corps in Africa, so the phone number on her voter registration is the same as my father’s.  Both of them are registered as “No Party Preference” (or “Decline-to-State” in the pre-Prop 14 parlance).  They each voted in 3 of the last 5 elections (2 generals and a special for my sister; 2 generals and a primary for my father).

Fellow OC Political Editor Chris Emami informs me he also received the phone call but did not get a recording.  I’m glad my father never answers his phone.  Emami also received a mailer similar to this phone call.

Not sure if I’m getting missed or intentionally outside their phone universe.  I’ve been registered as a Republican since I’ve been 18 and have voted 5 of the last 5 elections.  (Actually, it’s way more than 5 of 5, as I’ve voted in every single primary, general, special, and recall election since I turned 18, but I’m not going to sit down and count how many elections that’s been.)

Posted in Anaheim | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments »