CRA has really stepped up their game this year thanks to OC Political author and CRA State Vice-President Craig Alexander. Take a look at this awesome slate mailer that went out throughout Orange County to voters. It is formatted like a newspaper with a list of endorsements and some advertisements.
Posts Tagged ‘CRA’
Orange County Mailbox: CRA Slate Mailer
Posted by Chris Emami on June 2, 2012
Posted in Mail | Tagged: CRA | 9 Comments »
Why I Did Not Vote to Endorse John Campbell for Re-Election
Posted by Craig P. Alexander on May 14, 2012
In February of this year the Orange County Republican Party (“OCGOP”) voted to endorse several incumbent Congressmen for re-election. One of the incumbents seeking that endorsement was Congressman John Campbell. As an elected member of the OCGOP I was entitled to a vote and to voice my opinion on the subject. I spoke out against that endorsement and voted No.
This was the first time the OCGOP was doing endorsements for partisan offices since the passage of the terrible “Top Two Primary” of Proposition 14. Prior to passage of Prop. 14, the official party did not endorse in partisan races such as Congress. But Prop. 14 has forced the Republican Party to do so and the OCGOP is the official arm of the Party in Orange County.
The tipping point for me regarding Congressman Campbell was the December 2010 lame duck Congress’ vote to repeal the military’s policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (“DADT”) regarding active homosexuals serving in the military. Prior to this vote I was becoming troubled with Congressman Campbell’s vote in favor of TARP and Cash for Clunkers and his abstaining on the vote to bailout the auto industry. When Congressman Campbell 1st ran for Congress in a special election, I was one of those who supported him by helping him obtain the endorsement of the California Republican Assembly and walking precincts for him. Until the most recent re-districting, I lived inside Mr. Campbell’s congressional district. Seeing him vote with the lame duck Democrats for the repeal of DADT was a shock and disappointment.
As a former U.S. Marine (1975 – 1978), I understand something about serving in the military including what I consider very severe challenges to service members’ 1st amendment rights of freedom of religion and free speech due to this change in policy. Almost immediately I wrote a letter to Congressman Campbell advising him that I did not agree with his vote, that as a former member of the military I felt I had some legitimate concerns over the implications of the repeal of DADT for those serving our country in the armed forces and I asked to meet with him to discuss this.
For over one year Congressman Campbell knew of my request (according to his District Director) but never would meet with me. At the OCGOP meeting in February I asked him to explain his vote to repeal DADT and why he would not meet with me, one of his supporters and constituents. Congressman Campbell stated to the members and guests of the OCGOP that he felt his vote was right partially due to information he, as a Congressman, had that we constituents did not have (can we spell arrogance!). He then went on to state several other things he has done as a Congressman that he was proud of – without once explaining why he would not meet with me (in his oral response to my questions he did not even acknowledge me or my letter to him on the DADT subject).
Almost immediately following this, Bill Dunlap (an OCGOP alternate) rose and asked Congressman Campbell why he is never in the District to meet with constituents or hold town hall meetings (bravo Bill!). The Congressman’s only response was that he feels his mass e-mails to his e-mail list is sufficient. I guess that means to the Congressman that face-to-face contact with voters in his District is not only not important but also not needed.
I am not important in this matter. What is important is a person who is supposed to be a representative in Congress who refuses to meet with a constituent on an important public policy issue. In my opinion that is not a proper attitude for a Congressman. Congressman Campbell did not lose my vote for endorsement – he did not earn it. Congressman Campbell fell short of the two thirds votes necessary for him to receive the OCGOP endorsement (He was later able to obtain the endorsement of the CRP when the executive board met privately).
For those who live in the new 45th Congressional District, as you consider who to vote for in the June 5, 2012 election, I offer you this information for your consideration. If I lived in the 45th District I would cast my vote for Republican John Webb.
Posted in 45th Congressional District | Tagged: Bill Dunlap, Congressman John Campbell, CRA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, John Webb, OCGOP, TARP | 1 Comment »
Third Supervisorial District: Todd Spitzer in the Mail
Posted by Chris Nguyen on May 9, 2012
Excluding the Anaheim TOT mail (which has nothing to do with the June election), I received my fifth mailer of the primary election cycle yesterday. The first mailer was from Congressman Ed Royce’s campaign on April 4, the second one was from Todd Spitzer’s campaign for the Third Supervisorial District on April 19, the third one was another Royce piece on April 28, the fourth one was another Spitzer piece on May 1. This mailer is the third I’ve received from Spitzer’s campaign, and the fifth I’ve received from any campaign this cycle.
This piece is obviously geared toward Republican voters.
The side with the address label has the two-star Republican elephant along with a large font highlighting Spitzer’s “Local Elected Official of the Year” award 12 years ago from the OCGOP. It also has a picture of Spitzer with OCGOP Chairman Scott Baugh. ”Todd Spitzer” is the largest font on the page, is part of his campaign logo, and is repeated again in the caption under the picture with Baugh, thereby repeating his name thrice as a way to reinforce name ID even among voters who won’t flip the piece over to read the other side (I guess technically it’s four times since the paid for by message has his name, but that’s in the fine print).
The other side of the piece emphasizes conservative Republican values. It includes a big CRA logo (with the official three-star Republican elephant) highlighting Spitzer’s CRA endorsement, including a quote from CRA Vice President (and OC Political blogger) Craig Alexander. The piece also includes bullet points listing Republican stances on taxes, pensions, and crime, along with Spitzer’s membership on the Republican Central Committee and “A” rating from the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. This side of the piece also repeats Spitzer’s name in large type thrice, again reinforcing name ID even among voters who won’t read the piece and who received the piece in the mail with the address/postage side face down.
A subtle touch is the photo which has a clearly visible North Orange County Conservative Coalition logo on the banner behind Spitzer at the speech he was giving. A casual reader might not notice the logo. It does, however, catch the eye of anyone who recognizes the logo.
This is the first mailer from any campaign in quite a while that doesn’t include the needless logos that I admonished campaigns about in this post.
This is the first Spitzer mailer I’ve received that isn’t a four-pager that opens up. This is a two-sided 8.5″ x 11″ piece.
Posted in 3rd Supervisorial District, Mail | Tagged: CRA, Craig Alexander, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, North Orange County Conservative Coalition, Scott Baugh, Todd Spitzer | Leave a Comment »
Good Ole Boys Pervert Conservativism
Posted by The Rock of OC on March 27, 2012
In a shocking defeat for real conservatives, the good ole boys seized the endorsement of the CRA for their big-government retread, Todd Spitzer.
Hope for conservatives got a bit bleaker as the special interests gained control of the group that is supposed to be the conscience of the Republican Party. In the Board of Supervisors race, Deborah Pauly is the only proven limited government, fiscal conservative who will represent the people, but in a perversion of Republican ideals, the CRA endorsed career politician Spitzer, who is in bed with the unions.
In this David and Goliath battle, Pauly is the true conservative and special-interest Spitzer is the candidate of the unions. He is a RINO and backed costly pension deals when he was previously a Supervisor. He will not cut the size of local government or reform pensions because he’s one of the guys who caused Orange County’s three-billion-dollar unfunded pension liabilities!
Special-interest Spitzer is slick and polished. He’s a very connected career politician who’s part of the good ole boys who run Orange County.
The time is ripe to save Orange Coutny from the career politicians who are bought and paid for to do the bidding of their masters who cram their campaign bank accounts with tens of thousands of special interest dollars.
The CRA missed its chance, but the people know the truth. They will not allow Orange County to be raped by the special interests gorging at the public trough.
Posted in 3rd Supervisorial District | Tagged: CRA, Deborah Pauly, Todd Spitzer | 7 Comments »
CRA Rejects Pauly’s Threats, Endorses Spitzer in Upset
Posted by HBK on March 27, 2012
In a victory for civility over coercion and conservativism over fringe elements, the California Republican Assembly endorsed Todd Spitzer over Deborah Pauly in an amazing upset.
Pauly could not conduct herself with dignity at the CRA endorsing meeting. Her campaign strategy is simple: attack Spitzer and hope that no one sees she does not have the experience or temperament to be an Orange County Supervisor. On the other hand, Spitzer has the qualities necessary to work with others as a team, work with others to solve problems, and work with others for Orange County. Spitzer clearly demonstrated this attitude and perspective during the CRA endorsing meeting: Pauly is a divider; Spitzer brings people together with dignity and respect to carry Orange County forward.
Pauly spoke about her role in forming the Orange-Villa Park CRA unit while Spitzer is the only candidate who is currently a member of his local CRA unit: Orange-Villa Park. Why isn’t Pauly still in the Orange-Villa Park CRA unit?
As a long-time CRA activist, shouldn’t the endorsement have been a shoo-in for Pauly? It’s clear the people who know her best know she does not have the qualities to be an Orange County Supervisor, which is why the CRA backed Spitzer in an upset for the endorsement.
The more Pauly spoke, the more support she lost. In the first round, Spitzer led Pauly 14-6-2. In the second round, Pauly lost half her supporters and one of the neutral voters went to Spitzer, giving him the endorsement 18-3-1.
Why is that? It’s simple: the CRA allowed each candidate to speak for a minute before the second round of voting, and in her speech, Pauly decided to threaten the CRA. When she’s trying to persuade an organization to support her, she resorts to threats. This is the same way she conducts herself in meetings. If she’s threatening people to get an endorsement, imagine what she’d do on the Board of Supervisors!
The CRA is the largest and most conservative grassroots organization in the state and represents the everyday values of conservative voters. This proves that Spitzer is the conservative candidate, and Pauly is just a fringe candidate.
Posted in 3rd Supervisorial District | Tagged: CRA, Deborah Pauly, Todd Spitzer | 6 Comments »






