OC Political

A right of center blog covering local, statewide, and national politics

  • Custom Campaigns

    Custom Campaigns
  • DMI

    DMI
  • Contact Us to Purchase an Ad

  • CRA

    CRA

Archive for the ‘Board of Equalization’ Category

New California Tax Policy – Retroactive Tax for Five Years WITH Interest

Posted by nick kump on March 26, 2013

Despite unanimous opposition from newspapers up and down the state, the Franchise Tax Board continues to stick by its decision to retroactively tax small businesses owners back five years for investing in California businesses. These are the people who are creating jobs and California is literally chasing them away.

One group of individuals is taking stand against the policy though – California Business Defense. The group will meet in San Diego next week and is specifically looking for more individuals who will be directly impacted by the policy. More information on the group and the status briefing in San Diego is available on the group’s website at www.cabusinessdefense.org.

Since 1993, small business owners and investors have been able to take advantage of a tax incentive that California actively promoted. The policy allowed stockholders who sold their share in a California business to reduce their tax liability by up to 50 percent or even 100 percent if the money from the sale was reinvested in a California business. The policy basically made it attractive for entrepreneurs to invest in small businesses and create jobs because it significantly reduced the tax liability for doing so.

Now though a court decided that this policy violated the commerce clause in the Constitution because it discriminates against out of state businesses. The FTB decided to embrace the court’s decision by retroactively taxing all the small business owners and investors who took advantage of the policy for the last five years. And not only that, but charge the tax WITH interest! The horrendous policy is expected to earn the state an easy $120 million.

But stop to think about what California is doing and the significance of what it means it could do in the future. These investors did exactly what they were asked to do by risking their own capital and investing in businesses in California. California promoted the tax break because it meant people were creating jobs and more people working. After receiving that benefit for two decades, California now wants to retroactively tax the very people that made the job growth possible. Some of those investments worked out and some of them did not but the FTB does not care and the tax will apply to all individuals even if they lost everything taking a risk to create jobs for California.

This policy has is so shocking that it has made national headlines on Fox News and Fortune, but the FTB stands by the decision. It has been likened to California changing the speed limit back down to 55 mph on highways, and then sending speeding tickets to everyone who drove over 55 for the last five years. That is exactly what is happening, and this decision by the FTB is the tipping point for many individuals, who can no longer justify the expense and risk of doing business in California. What message does it send to people considering starting a business if California can decide years down the road to penalize them for doing so?

Fortunately, Assemblyman Jeff Gorell, R-Camarillo and Sen. Ted Lieu, D-Torrance have stepped up in a bi-partisan effort to right the wrongs of the FTB. SB 209 would prohibit the state from charging interest and penalties in similar situations in the future.

At least one member of the FTB recognizes that this is a bad policy. In a letter to State Controller John Chiang, Board of Equalization Chairman Jerome E. Horton, and Director of Finance Ana J. Matosantos, Board Member George Runner urged them to reverse their decision to implement the policy. Despite the missive, no response has been seen from any of them.

California doesn’t need more laws to correct this policy. It needs needs policy makers with common sense. And this is another unfortunate example of exactly what is wrong with this great state.

 

 

Posted in Board of Equalization | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Moreno Running for Supervisor?

Posted by Chris Nguyen on January 30, 2013

Jim Moreno

Jim Moreno

Michelle Steel

Michelle Steel

Well, it’s that time again.  Campaign finance reports are due tomorrow.  Those finance reports will allow us to reflect back on 2012 and get a glimpse into 2014.

Most candidates will wait until tomorrow to file their reports, but some have already filed.

The campaign finance reports show minor movement in the 2014 race to succeed termed-out Orange County Supervisor John Moorlach (R-Costa Mesa) in the Second District.

Back on September 7, while everyone else was distracted by the 2012 elections, Coast Community College District Trustee Jim Moreno (D-Huntington Beach) filed paperwork to form his committee: Jim Moreno for Orange County Supervisor 2nd District – 2014.  The domain name for his campaign web site (still under construction), Jim4Supervisor.com, was registered on September 19.

Conveniently for blog readers, Moreno filed his campaign finance report yesterday for the period ending December 31, and it shows the only contributions his supervisorial campaign has ever received are three loans from himself and his wife totaling $2,100.  He’s spent $972 on “business cards, stationary, and envelopes” according to the report.

It’s unclear what the rationale is on the timing of opening his committee.  If he is running for Supervisor, it would have made more sense to wait until January 1 to open the committee, so he’d have the first six months of 2013 to raise money before the next report is due.  If he isn’t running for Supervisor, he doesn’t need a place to temporarily hold money, as the Coast Community College District has neither contribution limits nor term limits, so Moreno could raise unlimited sums into his community college board account for any year and then slide the money into any other campaign he wants.  I’m not certain why he opened a committee that only possesses $2,100 of his and his wife’s money.

Jose Solorio

Jose Solorio

Moreno’s college board account has $1,415 cash on hand.  On December 30, he did receive a $250 contribution from Rancho Santiago Community College District Trustee Jose Solorio (D-Santa Ana), a former Assemblyman and likely 2014 Senate candidate for SD-34.

State Board of Equalization Vice Chair Michelle Steel (R-Surfside) has already announced her bid for the Second District seat on the Orange County Board of Supervisors.

Steel has a clear advantage over Moreno due to a number of factors:

  • Money: As of June 30, Steel had more than $222,000 cash on hand in her BOE account, much of which she could use in a supervisorial campaign.  (She has not yet filed her campaign finance reports covering the July 1-December 31 period, which are not due until tomorrow.)  Moreno has $3,515 cash on hand even combining his supervisorial and college board accounts.
  • Name ID: Voters across the entire Second Supervisorial District have voted for Steel as that entire district is inside her Board of Equalization district.  Voters in four of the ten cities in the Second Supervisorial District are not part of the Coast Community College District and have never seen Moreno on the ballot.
  • Party Affiliation: Although it is a nonpartisan seat, Republicans hold a 14% registration advantage over the Democrats in the Second Supervisorial District.  Republicans have had uninterrupted control of the seat for at least half a century.

Conventional wisdom holds that Steel’s toughest opponent will be another Republican, not a Democrat.  Even among Democrats, Moreno’s not their strongest candidate.

Posted in 2nd Supervisorial District, Board of Equalization, Coast Community College District | Tagged: , , , | 3 Comments »

New Legislation Will Increase Guidance at BOE: Steel Newsletter for August, 2012

Posted by Chris Nguyen on September 3, 2012

This came over the wire from Board of Equalization Member Michelle Steel’s office on Friday…

The Michelle Steel Newsletter Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Board of Equalization | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Say No to Taxes, Yes to Regulatory Reform: Steel Newsletter for June, 2012

Posted by Newsletter Reprint on July 1, 2012

This came over the wire from Board of Equalization Member Michelle Steel’s office on Thursday…

Posted in Board of Equalization | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Board of Equalization Vice Chair Michelle Steel: Give Californians a single tax agency

Posted by Newsletter Reprint on May 12, 2012

This came over the wire from Board of Equalization Vice Chair Michelle Steel’s office on Thursday…

The Michelle Steel Newsletter

ICYMI: Give Californians a single tax agency

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT…

OC Register

Give Californians a single tax agency

By Michelle Steel and Lou Correa Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Board of Equalization | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Michelle Steel – ICYMI: Appeals Court Overturns 1550% Tax Hike on Flavored Beers

Posted by Newsletter Reprint on May 5, 2012

This came over the wire from Board of Equalization Vice Chair Michelle Steel’s office on Thursday…

The Michelle Steel Newsletter

ICYMI: Appeals Court Overturns 1550% Tax Hike on Flavored Beers Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Board of Equalization | Tagged: | 2 Comments »

We Have a Right to Know What We Owe: Steel Newsletter for April, 2012

Posted by Newsletter Reprint on May 3, 2012

This came over the wire from Board of Equalization Vice Chair Michelle Steel’s office on Monday:

The Michelle Steel Newsletter

“Fighting for California Taxpayers” Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Board of Equalization | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

BOE Member Michelle Steel’s Newsletter for March, 2012

Posted by Newsletter Reprint on March 31, 2012

This came over the wire from Michelle Steel’s office on Friday…

Posted in Board of Equalization | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

SteelNews: Don’t Pay a Tax You May Not Owe

Posted by Newsletter Reprint on March 2, 2012

This came over the wire from Michelle Steel’s office:

ICYMI:             Michelle Steel in the Orange County Register

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT…

Michelle Steel: Don’t pay a tax you may not owe

California taxing agencies’ table for figuring tax on online, mail-order purchases wrongly pegged to taxpayers’ income, not how many untaxed purchases they may have made.

By Michelle Steel

According to the Board of Equalization, 99.5 percent of Californians paid no “use tax” in 2010, despite a concerted effort by the agency and the Legislature to increase compliance.

Even a 2009 law requiring Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Board of Equalization | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 472 other followers