OC Political

A right-of-center blog covering local, statewide, and national politics

  • Custom Campaigns

    Custom Campaigns
  • DMI

  • Lindholm for County Board of Education

  • Glasky for IUSD

  • Woolery for Auditor-Controller

  • Ming for Supervisor

  • Rackauckas for District Attorney

  • Contact Us to Purchase an Ad

  • Lincoln Club of Orange County

$100,000 Loans Sprinkled Across OC Assembly Campaigns

Posted by Chris Nguyen on July 25, 2013

Ling-Ling Chang, Paul Glaab, and Steve Baric

$100,000-Loan Club: AD-55 Candidate Ling-Ling Chang (R-Diamond Bar), AD-73 Candidate Paul Glaab (R-Laguna Niguel), and AD-73 Candidate Steve Baric (R-Rancho Santa Margarita)

$100,000 is the magical amount sprinkled in loans across campaigns for Assembly representing portions of Orange County.

  • In AD-55, OC Political’s Allen Wilson reported earlier on initial indications of $100,000 from Diamond Bar Councilwoman Ling-Ling Chang to her own Assembly campaign.  Her Form 497 shows she loaned herself $100,000 on June 30.  (Although Chang is from the LA County city of Diamond Bar, the tri-county 55th Assembly District includes the OC cities of Brea, La Habra, Placentia, and Yorba Linda.)
  • In AD-73, former Laguna Niguel Councilman Paul Glaab loaned his own Assembly campaign $100,000 on June 30, according to his Form 497.
  • Also in AD-73, the law firm of Baric & Tran loaned Rancho Santa Margarita Councilman Steve Baric‘s Assembly campaign $100,000 on July 10, according to his Form 497.

So why do candidates loan $100,000 to their own campaigns?  On rare occasions, a candidate may actually spend the money. However, 99% of the time, the candidates will not spend the money, as they are simply loaning their campaigns the $100,000 to inflate their warchests with every expectation of repaying the entire loan once the election is over.  By inflating their warchests by $100,000, the candidates hope to:

  • scare potential opponents (who would be afraid to face down another $100,000)
  • convince donors to contribute more to the campaign (donors tend to give money to candidates who show they have money in a bandwagon effect)
  • both of the above

As they are not yet due, the Form 460s (the complete campaign finance reports for each reporting period) have not been filed by any campaigns for AD-55 or AD-73 for the January 1-June 30 reporting periods.  Due to the $100,000 loans, the Chang, Glaab, and Baric campaigns had to submit their Form 497s, as those must be filed within 10 business days of receipt of more than $5,000 from any one source (in the final 90 days before an election, Form 497s must be filed within 24 hours of receipt of more than $1,000 from any one source).

Chang and Glaab both loaned their campaigns the $100,000 on June 30.  The significance of that date is that June 30 is the final date of the reporting period for the first half of 2013.  The next reporting period doesn’t close until December 31.  Due to their loans, Chang and Glaab will be able to show an additional $100,000 on their Form 460 reports and then spend the latter half of 2013 raising money before the next reports are due.

The $100,000 loan from Baric & Tran on July 10 is a puzzling case, as it is not a personal loan and it was made very early in the reporting period and won’t appear on Baric’s Form 460 until after December 31.

What is the magic of the specific $100,000 figure?  It’s the most a candidate can loan their own campaign and still get repaid.  Any amount loaned to the campaign that exceeds a $100,000 balance is considered a contribution to the campaign, rather than a loan, so it cannot be repaid to the candidate.

Specifically, Government Code Section 85307(b) prohibits candidates for state office (i.e. the Legislature, the Board of Equalization, and all statewide offices other than U.S. Senator) from having an outstanding balance of more than $100,000 in personal loans to their own campaigns.

The candidate is the only person (or entity) who can loan a campaign more than the contribution limit.  Any other person or entity is subject to the campaign contribution limit of $4,100 per election for a state legislative race (this limit is in place through the end of the 2014 General Election).

11 Responses to “$100,000 Loans Sprinkled Across OC Assembly Campaigns”

  1. Allen Wilson said

    Good article, which serves as a primer for the readers to understand why candidates do what they do by loaning $100K to the campaign kitty!

  2. Curious said

    I may be wrong, but if Baric loaned $100,000 from his business, isn’t that a violation of FPPC rules?

  3. OCInsider#33 said

    Curious, not sure, but I think if he owns at least 50% of the business he is considered an owner and it’s the same as a personal loan. I also think you are allowed to take loans from other sources. But that is just an educated guess, anyone know Shirley Grindle’s number? What I really want to know is where did Paul Glaab get $100K? Didn’t he have to close up his business and sell his house? It would be interesting to know how many of these actually stayed in the accounts longer then one day.

  4. Jim said

    Glaab is a mile wide and an 1/8 inch substance. He is owned by Roger Faubel.

  5. […] $100,000 Loans Sprinkled Across OC Assembly Campaigns […]

  6. […] also wrote more extensively about $100,000 loans two weeks ago in a post that included information about Chang’s loans and loans from two AD-73 […]

  7. […] also wrote more extensively about $100,000 loans two weeks ago in a post that included information about loans from two AD-73 candidates and one AD-55 […]

  8. […] The news media is beginning to take note of the $100,000 candidate loans, which OC Political covered in “AD-55: Land of the $100,000-Loan Paper Tigers” (as well as in articles on the BOE-4 race, the AD-73 race, and on loans in general). […]

  9. […] to artificially inflate their warchest numbers.  While OC Political has many posts about those, this one is probably the seminal post on the issue.)  I will give Paul Glaab credit for actually spending […]

  10. […] to artificially inflate their warchest numbers.  While OC Political has many posts about those, this one is probably the seminal post on the issue.)   Both Chang and Chen gave themselves these $100,000 […]

  11. […] to artificially inflate their warchest numbers.  While OC Political has many posts about those, this one is probably the seminal post on the issue.)  I will give Paul Glaab credit for actually […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 946 other followers