OC Political

A right-of-center blog covering local, statewide, and national politics

  • Custom Campaigns

    Custom Campaigns
  • DMI

  • Lindholm for County Board of Education

  • Pollitt for County Board of Education

  • Glasky for IUSD

  • Rackauckas for District Attorney

  • Woolery for Auditor-Controller

  • Iglesias for 69th Assembly District

  • Ming for Supervisor

  • Contact Us to Purchase an Ad

  • Lincoln Club of Orange County

Assemblyman Don Wagner: Budget Fact Check – Is High Speed Rail More of a Budget Priority Than Education?

Posted by Newsletter Reprint on July 7, 2012

This came over the wire from Assemblyman Don Wagner’s office on Thursday…

Don Wagner | District 70
Image

Is High Speed Rail More of a Budget Priority Than Education?

On June 15th, the Legislature adopted the 2012-13 budget (AB 1464). Amendments to the budget bill (AB 1497) and the education budget trailer bill (SB 1016), the bill that implements the education policy changes needed to make the budget work, were adopted on June 27th.

As the Legislature prepares to cast votes on a high speed rail plan that could cost taxpayers as much as $68 billion, there are serious questions about whether high speed rail is more of a priority in the majority vote budget than education.

While there was plenty of rhetoric about how education was a priority for the majority party, the California Budget Fact Check found:

  • Despite an $8.5 billion tax increase proposal, Proposition 98 would benefit by only $2.9 billion of the new money in 2012-13. Because the new money is, for the most part, used to buy down ongoing K-14 budgetary deferrals and backfill prior-year one-time savings actions, no new programmatic funding will be available for schools. California’s CSU and UC higher education systems will also see no programmatic funding increase in 2012-13 despite the proposed tax increase.
  • The budget targets education for 99% of the education trigger cuts despite the fact that education only represents 50% of General Fund spending. Under the trigger cut proposal, schools will still take a $2.7 billion programmatic hit and a $300 million cut for community colleges.  UC and CSU will take a $500 million cut.
  • The majority vote budget rejected both a Legislative Analyst’s proposal and a Republican proposal to reduce or eliminate the Governor’s proposed education trigger cuts.
  • The budget ignores the vast majority of the Education Coalition concerns outlined in their May position paper.
  • Health and welfare is virtually untouched in the Governor’s 2012-13 trigger cuts, even though health and welfare costs will continue to grow by 18 percent over the next 3 years and represent about 30 percent of General Fund spending.

Click to continue reading “Is High Speed Rail More of a Budget Priority Than Education?”

Make Your Voices Heard

Click the links below to make your voices heard in the budget debate and send us your ideas to cut wasteful spending and reform government.

DISTRICT OFFICE
3 Park Plaza, Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 863-7070, (949) 863-9337 fax
CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol, Room 4153
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 319-2070, (916) 319-2170 fax
Facebook  Twitter
© 2012 ASSEMBLY REPUBLICAN CAUCUS | DISCLAIMER

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 895 other followers